請各位先登陸 (studentID,Moodle 密碼登陸),後編輯
請各位使用左方之工具列上的上載文件連結上載習作相關的相片

Leung Tin Wai: Henry Tang is not qualified to be the next Chief Executive

出自香港新聞網 - 樹仁新傳系學生實習習作

跳轉到: 導航, 搜尋

October 11, 2011

Shelly Pan Chu Yuan Report


The senior journalist and department head of Journalism and Mass Communication of Hong Kong Shue Yan University, Leung Tin Wai, criticized Henry Tang today, saying that “he has no qualification to be the next Chief Executive of Hong Kong.”

Compared with Edmund Ho Hau Wah, the former Chief Executive of Macao and Clinton, the former President of America, who have dealt with scandal affairs with public and media, Leung believes that Henry Tang is (far from them-far in what sense?).

Even though Henry (two previous samples? which?) (sample refers to merchandise or music) on dealing with public relations, Leung believes Henry has not learnt from either. Leung commented on Henry Tang’s crisis management skills on his recent scandal, saying that Henry has no political sense.

“Have you seen Edmund’s (account with the media?) (what do you mean by account?)? No one has a question about his scandal anymore,” said Leung.

After hearing the talk Esme Lau, the Public Affairs Manager of Power Assets Holdings Ltd., on feeling “Henry has already explained what he can explain”, Leung emphasis that Henry’s explanations means nothing. (This sentence makes the reader wonder who heard Esme Lau's talk, and where this is coming from? Also the wording is a bit ambiguous, did Leung agree with Lau, did he hear the talk as well-I am asking this as someone who does not know Shue Yan hosted a talk)

Your news angle is focused, your title could be shortened to "Henry Tang Deemed Unqualified to be next CE". Since your main criticism is that he did not handle the scandal about his affair, you should provide the reader with an example to agree with-for example questions left unanswered.
個人工具