請各位先登陸 (studentID,Moodle 密碼登陸),後編輯
請各位使用左方之工具列上的上載文件連結上載習作相關的相片

Think Rational Hong Kong People

出自香港新聞網 - 樹仁新傳系學生實習習作

在2013年9月26日 (四) 00:48由Hlcheng (對話 | 貢獻)所做的修訂版本
(差異) ←上一修訂 | 當前修訂 (差異) | 下一修訂→ (差異)
跳轉到: 導航, 搜尋

(Your first sentence was not news but just an observation which should be deleted. You should explain at least a bit about how the occupy central movement would bring about a change towards the advancement of democracy in your lead. To refute something is to prove something wrong, Therefore a better way to put it would be "....refuted the idea of occupying central would not be as peaceful as the organizers claimed." Your story was one-sided without offering any counter argument from the other camp.)


Democracy in Hong Kong has always been commented as stagnated because there is not yet any real general election to be happened. The topic of “Occupying Central” had raised attention from the public that if this could lead to a change towards the prospect of democracy in Hong Kong. Chow Yung, the organizer of “Silent Majority”, refuted the idea of occupying Central since this will produce riot and deteriorate the social stability.

Chow focused the problem of not happening general election on the responsibilities of the democracy parties. The People Republic Of China had already promised the commitment on general election in 2017; however, the vote for passing the draft is to be determined approximately 4 counts from those parties. So, if general election cannot be implemented, people should not blame the government. Therefore, The People Republic of China has the power to deny the judge of the final election. Unfortunately, if the choice of Hong Kong people was denied one day, Chow would feel sorry for them, but he believed they can come up with a rational decision.

As one of the leader of the Silent Majority, Chow emphasized that their job was to protect Hong Kong from riot that would damage the economy. He didn’t oppose citizens disobeying the law unless there was no one to be affected. However, he disagreed with threatening the economy to obtain certain wants and that may result an unhappy ending. He repeated many times that the ultimate goal was to seek a win- win situation of the people and the government.

個人工具